MaestroReviews

Deb and I are artists, painters actually. We go see films as often as once a week. That's right, we go to the theater and sit in a dark room with strangers to see movies. We rarely rent. We like "little" movies, foreign and documentary films. We try to stay away from mainstream and blockbusters whenever possible, but a couple sneak in each year. We seek out the obscure. We try to avoid violent movies, and that really limits our choices, most film makers seem to think violence makes a story interesting.
I try not to give anything away in the reviews, but offer an honest reaction.
We rate them 1~10, 10 being highest.

Sunday, March 21, 2010

An Education

Deb 10 Me 10

English movies are a red flag. It’s hard for me to relate to their culture and often difficult to understand the dialog. I missed half a dozen words near the beginning of this movie but they either started talking normal or my ears acclimated early to the English accents.

Longevity is a green flag. We’ve been talking about seeing this movie since Christmas. Almost weekly we look at the list of movies in our area and utter the title out loud, saying “That would be good”, but see something else. Last night we did it again and figured this has to go away soon so we'd better see it. The guy at the ticket window said it has been playing there for three and a half months. We go in and there are a lot of people, way more than at an opening night movie we saw last week.

Deb has been thinking about the movie and has developed certain expectations. She’s thinking along the lines of Educating Rita and has built a whole movie up in her head. My head is empty.

The movie is set in 1962 in what looks like the English equivalent of Archie Bunkers place and features a Bristol 404, a way cool looking car. The accents fall away pretty quick, there’s an odd sunny day rain scene (which may happen in England) and it’s populated by an easy to look at cast. Then you start to get sucked in by the story.

When you look at the story line on the computer it says this: “In the post-war, pre-Beatles London suburbs, a bright schoolgirl is torn between studying for a place at Oxford and the more exciting alternative offered to her by a charismatic older man.” I won’t be telling you much more than that about the story.

But I’ll tell you this; in places it reminded me of Juno, a smart kid who tackles issues much larger than her; with high spirits, intelligence and enviable humor. And like Juno, there weren’t too many people I recognized as actors, so it’s more like a real life tale. Alfred Molina is easy to pick out of a crowd and Emma Thompson has a part, I guess a movie is not English unless she’s in it. But the people are likable and they’re behaving in believable ways and they’re moving the story along.

I guess this was what appealed to me. The story was tight. There wasn’t a bunch of characters that go nowhere, no dead-end sub plots and surprisingly, no unanswered questions at the end. It’s a good old-fashioned story movie. It’s a plausible tale that’s well told with actors who don’t feel like they’re acting, places that don’t look like movie sets (except for one) and good fodder for conversation afterwards.

Friday, March 19, 2010

The Art of The Steal

Deb 7 Me 8

This movie is a straight documentary. It looks like it was made for TV and I hope it is aired soon so more people can enjoy it. I really liked it. The subject is the art collection of the Barnes Foundation, a topic Deb and I have been interested in for many years.

I don’t want to give anything away, but here’s the basic points. A guy named Barnes starts buying art. He buys quality art from quality artists, and he buys it just ahead of the curve of social recognition. By the time the rest of world figures out that Renoir and Picasso and VanGogh are the real thing, he has amassed a huge collection of them. People that were dogging his collection now envied it.

But it was his collection and he built a nice place to house it and placed his own restrictions on who and how it could be seen. He made an art school and the students had first hand access to the collection. He wanted to keep the snobs and social elite at bay, welcoming the students and the “common man”. If you were Rockefeller you probably had a harder time seeing the collection that if you were Rockefeller’s gardener.

And Barnes put that in his will too. He decreed that the collection stay in tact exactly as he hung it, for perpetuity. It wasn’t to be sold, loaned out or even moved. It wasn’t to be offered to the general public, open to select viewers no more than two days a week. It was never to become a backdrop for hoity-toity elitists.

Over time the collection became extremely valuable and a power struggle emerged over control of the art. That’s the story the film explores and it’s fascinating. This is a very interesting study of the struggle for power by people who don’t take no for an answer. If you’re not interested in art, draw your own parallels, antique cars, baseball cards, furniture. It could be a family story, heirs fighting over their parents estate, but it’s a good story and worth checking out.

Deb gave it 7 and I ran it up to 8. Looking back we each think it warrants more.